All Things Lighting
For those who know their SON from their SOX!
| Home > Luminaires > Fluorescent Luminaires > Surface Fluorescent Luminaires |
 |
FILE 567/600 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|
||
|
 |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
| File information | |
| Filename: | Fitzgerald_LPFH230_Twin_30W_Batten.jpg |
| Album name: | Paul / Surface Fluorescent Luminaires |
| Comments: | This is one I got for a reasonable price off ebay. It's a Fitzgerald LPFH230 batten for two 3' 30W Tubes. You don't see many twin 3 footers, in fact you don't tend to see that many standard battens about in the 3' length. This is |
| Filesize: | 117 KiB |
| Date added: | May 01, 2011 |
| Dimensions: | 734 x 1200 pixels |
| Displayed: | 155 times |
| URL: | https://allthingslighting.co.uk/atl/displayimage.php?pid=873 |
| Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |
|
|||
|
Well done on finding a twin 3' batten! Yes I think the only full size 3 footers have been Fitzy for well over 20 years! I have a 3' T12 single and it's rather unique! Just a shame I no longer have a T12 3' tube for it!
 The LPH series have always had rotating lampholders, I see yours is the later version. I prefer the LPV twins myself with the V formation as per that twin superslim of yours! 
|
|
|||
|
I remember seeing a new 3' T12 single Lightpack on ebay a couple of years ago but the seller refused postage!
 The lamp holders on this one would take T12s and I've put one end of a 2' T12 in to see if it looks silly or not and I don't think it does, obviously the proper T12 ones are better. I prefer the LPV twins too, I'm getting a 2' 18W one soon
|
|
|||
|
Shame about the postage issue on that new 3' T12 version! Would have come with a T12 Thorn tube!
|
|
|||
|
If you ask Kev nicely, he may let you have a pair of T8 sprung lampholders from one of those scrap HF twins! Then this'll match that 2' twin!
|
Comment 1 to 4 of 4 Page: 1 |