File information |
Filename: | Aquarium_Lighting_Upgrade.JPG |
Album name: | SuperSix / My Files |
Power Consumption: | 47W |
Working Voltage: | 240V |
Comments: | The lighting unit that sits on top of my aquarium. It used to contain a bare PCB glued to the bottom of the enclosure to run two non standard 2' 28W T5s. It obviously wasn't sealed properly during manufacture as it eventually filled with water and the ballast blew!
It failed outside the warranty and a replacement fitting costs over £70 so I decided to have a go at sorting the problem myself. After some swearing I managed to crack the thing open, gut it and fit what you see here. A Tridonic EC 2x18, two starter holders, two Arlen EFS120s, four Vossloh-Schwabe IP65 T8 lampholders and two Philips 18W/95s. The whole unit was then silicone sealed and hopefully will give many years or trouble free lighting! |
Filesize: | 694 KiB |
Date added: | May 11, 2014 |
Dimensions: | 1599 x 507 pixels |
Displayed: | 108 times |
URL: | https://allthingslighting.co.uk/atl/displayimage.php?pid=18314 |
Favourites: | Add to Favourites |
Haha! I can't do any job without getting slightly nasty, nothing ever goes to plan!
The 95s do an excellent job. Give a nice natural look, almost like diffused sunlight shining down!
The standards also say that, if a ballast is running 2 tubes say 2x18w, the required efficiency is the same as if 2 1x18w ballasts would be running the 2 tubes separately. So, it is allowed for a 2x18w ballast to waste as much power as 2 separate 18w ballasts.....
The manufacturers jumped on this, and manufacture this 2x18 ballast. Its an extremely lossy ballast (it is more lossy than the old "inefficient" 36-40 ballasts), running at its thermal limit when used with 2x18w tubes at 370-400mA (yep some of those do overdrive the tubes a bit, but not too bad). Running a 36w tube on it will most likely slowly cook it
The same thing btw is happening with the 26w PL-C lamps, they have been separated from the 18w T8 to a ballast of their own