Home > User Galleries > SuperSix > My Files
Click to view full size image

Aquarium Lighting Upgrade

DSCF0938.jpg GE_QUAD.jpg Aquarium_Lighting_Upgrade.JPG Thorn_2__0393B_18W_Whites.JPG DSCF0853.JPG
File information
Filename:Aquarium_Lighting_Upgrade.JPG
Album name:SuperSix / My Files
Power Consumption:47W
Working Voltage:240V
Comments:The lighting unit that sits on top of my aquarium. It used to contain a bare PCB glued to the bottom of the enclosure to run two non standard 2' 28W T5s. It obviously wasn't sealed properly during manufacture as it eventually filled with water and the ballast blew! It failed outside the warranty and a replacement fitting costs over £70 so I decided to have a go at sorting the problem myself. After some swearing I managed to crack the thing open, gut it and fit what you see here. A Tridonic EC 2x18, two starter holders, two Arlen EFS120s, four Vossloh-Schwabe IP65 T8 lampholders and two Philips 18W/95s. The whole unit was then silicone sealed and hopefully will give many years or trouble free lighting!
Filesize:694 KiB
Date added:May 11, 2014
Dimensions:1599 x 507 pixels
Displayed:108 times
URL:https://allthingslighting.co.uk/atl/displayimage.php?pid=18314
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 13 of 13
Page: 1

Tom   [May 11, 2014 at 06:23 PM]
Awesome conversion! Never seen a dedicated 2x18w choke before! Surely it's an EC36 rebranded?
SuperSix   [May 11, 2014 at 06:27 PM]
Thanks! These are a fair bit smaller than an EC36, got a few from some damaged Cooper modulars. I'd never seen a 2x 18W choke before either!
Funeral_86   [May 11, 2014 at 07:37 PM]
Is it a jewell aquarium? The HF lighting units have always put me off them!
Linear_SLI   [May 11, 2014 at 07:47 PM]
After some swearing! ROFL , sounds like most of my jobs!!, great conversion.
SuperSix   [May 11, 2014 at 08:10 PM]
Yes, it's a Jewell! I managed to haggle £100 off when I bought it as it was a display model, nothing wrong with it though! Cool There's some pretty long threads on a lot of fish keeping sites with people moaning about the lighting units, and giving guides on how to saw the bottoms open to replace the ballast. I thought I'd go for a more permanent solution with mine though and I managed to open it along the factory seal so it looks untouched!

Haha! I can't do any job without getting slightly nasty, nothing ever goes to plan! Mad
Kev   [May 11, 2014 at 08:17 PM]
Looks good! I've seen the 2x18W ballasts about for a whole now in VS Tridonic and halvar!
Tom   [May 11, 2014 at 08:25 PM]
Perhaps they're a new low loss range? Maybe a way round the bans we hope! Still see plenty of switchstart 4x18s being installed! Those 95s should be a good colour for the fish too!
Rob_TDCi   [May 11, 2014 at 08:27 PM]
Great conversion! Cool Same lampholders as mine!
SuperSix   [May 11, 2014 at 08:33 PM]
Could be Tom! They're fitted in all the Cooper 2' twin battens and 4x 18 mods now. I'm expecting them to switch to a different manufacturer though as Tridonic's magnetic ballast factory in Austria was shut down late last year!

The 95s do an excellent job. Give a nice natural look, almost like diffused sunlight shining down!
Paul   [May 11, 2014 at 08:52 PM]
I used to have a bow-fronted tank and the lighting unit in that seemed to be OK. Not sure it was a Jewell tank though.
Ash   [May 11, 2014 at 09:48 PM]
The thing is this : The new standards (read : bans) demands for efficiency are higher for higher power ballasts. for 18w ballast they demand efficiency X, for 36w the standards are higher, and so on

The standards also say that, if a ballast is running 2 tubes say 2x18w, the required efficiency is the same as if 2 1x18w ballasts would be running the 2 tubes separately. So, it is allowed for a 2x18w ballast to waste as much power as 2 separate 18w ballasts.....

The manufacturers jumped on this, and manufacture this 2x18 ballast. Its an extremely lossy ballast (it is more lossy than the old "inefficient" 36-40 ballasts), running at its thermal limit when used with 2x18w tubes at 370-400mA (yep some of those do overdrive the tubes a bit, but not too bad). Running a 36w tube on it will most likely slowly cook it

The same thing btw is happening with the 26w PL-C lamps, they have been separated from the 18w T8 to a ballast of their own
Linear_SLI   [May 12, 2014 at 07:06 AM]
These losses can be seen at worse in 28watt 2D fittings, as most in the UK are fitted with a standard 2 foot, 18/20watt choke, running a 28watt lamp! Confused
Ash   [May 13, 2014 at 08:32 AM]
The 2D is electrically quite similar to the 26w PL-C. They are high voltage, low current (320mA vs the 370mA of the T8-T12) lamps. The same ballast running a 28w 2D or a 26w PL-C will waste only about 3/4th of the watts it wastes with a T8-T12

Comment 1 to 13 of 13
Page: 1

Add your comment
Anonymous comments are not allowed here. Log in to post your comment